A first-of-its-kind measure in Colorado, which was defeated soundly, would have
defined life as beginning at conception.
The biological sciences have known and taught for decades that life begins at conception. How can a civil law possibly refute that? I'm trying to keep up here: science is infallible in describing the origins of the universe, but not in defining the origin of a person? Am I missing something here?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment